Showing posts with label Single Grain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Single Grain. Show all posts

Sunday, March 1, 2015

Teeling Single Grain Irish Whiskey Comes To The USA




The rising trend of drinkable grain whisky now sees a new Irish entry, joining Cooley's Greenore expressions (6, 8, 15, and 18 year old).  It's Teeling Single Grain Irish whiskey, just under 6 years old, but boasting solid complexity and drinkability for such a young grain whiskey.  The explanation involves a flavored barrel maturation story - which is quite a common trend these days, but the Devil is in the details.  The payoff here is that this is worth drinking.  (Grain whiskey, a traditional part of blended Scotch and Irish whiskies, is distilled from un-malted grains, typically corn, wheat, barley.  Distillation typically happens on column stills, often in an industrial setting, with distillation taken to very high proofs - usually in the mid 90% abv.  The resulting spirit is very light and sweet.  Grain whiskey suffered a stigma until recently when luxury expressions such as Compass Box Hedonism, Nikka Coffey Grain, Greenore, and recently Haig Club appeared).

There's deep kinship between Teeling Single Grain and Cooley's Greenore single grain whiskey.  It starts with the mash bill:  95% corn and the rest malted barley.  There's also the distillery: Cooley.  Cooley is the distillery that John Teeling converted to whiskey from potato schnapps from 1985 to 1987 by adding column stills.  Teeling's Cooley was the first Irish whiskey distillery in Irish hands in generations and marked the resurgence of Irish whiskey's innovation and local pride.  Fascinating expressions include double distilled (as opposed to the usual triple distilled) and richly peated Irish expressions.  Cooley was breaking the mold and pushing the envelope.  Beam International ended up buying Cooley in 2012 for $95 million.  (Beam has since been purchased by Suntory International.)

But the Teelings didn't take the money and get out of the game.  John Teeling's sons Jack and Stephen have started a new distillery project in Dublin (the first in a century).  They have just distilled their first run.  But while the distillery part gets up to speed and the whiskey ages, they are selling stocks secured under contract from Beam's Cooley as part of the Cooley sale.  Teeling sells a small batch blended Irish whiskey, a single malt, and a 21 year old single malt, as well as this new single grain - which will launch in the USA this week for msrp $49.95 a bottle.  So this is the same distillate as Greenore - but the similarities end there.  The barrel maturation story is different from inception, with Greenore maturing in ex-Bourbon barrels and Teeling Single Grain maturing entirely in ex-California Cabernet wine barrels for just a bit under 6 years.

In Oliver Klimek's landmark Malt Maniacs epistle of 2012 called "Complexity in Whisky - Lost and Found" he describes how production method changes in the past quarter century have robbed modern whiskies of complexity compared to whiskies from decades in the 70s and prior.  Whisky makers have compensated with wood management, strong flavors, vattings, and using wine and other spirit barrels:

"And of course there also are the ever-popular cask finishes. If done right, they really can enhance a whisky, like adding a few bells and whistles to a chamber concerto. But when things go wrong they are like the roaring saxophone playing in the string quartet."
http://www.maltmaniacs.net/E-pistles/Malt-Maniacs-2012-04-Complexity-In-Whisky.pdf

Klimek's hypothesis explains the wide spread of flavored barrel finishes and maturation.  Examples include Bill Lumsden's Glenmorangie and Ardbeg expressions, Jim McEwan's effusively creative Bruichladdichs, Lincoln Henderson's Angel's Envy, Rachel Barrie's Bowmores etc...  Teeling Single Grain isn't a wine finished whiskey.  It's matured in ex-wine barrels all the way.  It's a prime example of introducing other flavors into a simple spirit through the use of flavored barrels.  Teeling's Blended Irish Whiskey was finished in ex-rum casks.  The interesting wrinkle here is that this is a single grain whiskey getting the flavored barrel maturation treatment.  That's a fairly new thing - as single grain bottlings are still a pretty fresh segment.   But creative maturation schemes like this can be hit or miss.  Particularly with wine barrels.  The proof is in the glass.  So I took a wee sample and here are my notes...

Stephen Teeling presents

WhiskyCast's Mark Gillespie noses Teeling Single Grain

Teeling Single Grain Irish Whiskey - 46% abv

Color dark gold with coppery glints.

Nose: vanilla custard, burnt sugar, grapefruit citrus and a hint of dark chocolate with candied orange peel (my friend Temma Ehrenfeld's note).   Linseed oil.

Palate:   Sweet opening with vanilla frosting and honey.  The sting of medicinal grain.  Then complexity on the expansion with some nutty rancio, dark grape, red fruits and a drying of the palate with oak tannin, musk, and a clean herbal note as you head to the finish.  There are gentle wafts of bubble gum and mint.

Surprising complexity for a 5 year old grain whiskey.  This is engaging stuff that challenges your expectations of what young grain whiskey can be.  It's light and sweet like you'd expect, but there's more richness and complexity too.  It's doesn't have the tartness you might expect from wine barrel maturation. 

****

Someone with a palate is doing some good things over at Teeling.  This is a company to watch.

(20cc Sample secretly taken from a launch event at Rye House in Manhattan, with Teeling Single Grain presented by Stephen Teeling.  Event arranged by Baddish Group.) 

Stephen Teeling presenting Teeling Single Grain Irish Whiskey at Rye House in Manhattan.

Sunday, August 5, 2012

Grains and Confused



It's very human to make mistakes. That's what proof reading and error checking are for. However, in the course of the conception, planning, and execution of this post I made such a large blunder - one so central to the conception of the piece - that I feel it will be more instructive, or at least more amusing, to make the blunder itself the subject of the post. Before you click away in disgust let me reassure you that the topic is whisky: old and interesting whisky. There will be tasting notes too. This is meant to be an instructive lesson; not simply a train wreck. But I'll let you be the judge of that.

It all started in April when I wrote a review of Compass Box Hedonism - a blended grain whisky product of delicacy, grace, and a delicious and new flavor signature (for me). I decided to make it my business to try distinguished single grain whiskies.  I was perusing the samples available at our friend's The Masters of Malt.  I knew the names of some of the distillers of single grain whisky: North British, Girvan, Cameron Bridge, Strathclyde, and... and... Inchgower? ...Invergordon?  I always get those confused. It's Invergordon. Inchgower is a malt distillery - not a grain distillery.  It is the primary component in Bell's.  I made this error explicitly on Twitter.  I was discussing a particular old 1964 bottling of Invergordon from The Whisky Exchange. I referred to it as Inchgower in a tweet to Stuart Robson and Billy Abbot (@Cowfish) when the latter gently corrected me. As he did so a light went off.  I had selected and purchased my three mature grain samples, tasted them and written notes and even tweeted some of the notes all without realizing that one of the specimens wasn't a grain whisky at all!

Here are my detailed tasting notes for these three samples from Master of Malt.  Read them over and the discussion will resume afterwards:

"North British:

Edinburgh’s last working distillery, widely known as ‘NB’.
North British does its own malting on site using only maize, with a high persentage of green malt.
North British contributes to such top blends as: J&B, Famous Grouse, chives Regal, Lang's and Cutty Sark."

http://www.scotchwhisky.net/distilleries/silent/north_british.htm


North British 20 1991 Single Cask Master Of Malt 55.8% Cask 3225


Distilled on the 22nd January 1991.  Aged in a first fill bourbon barrel.  Bottled in March 2011. A single cask release of 244 bottles.

Color: pale gold

Nose: cake batter, daisies, acetone, cocoa butter and a hint of savory.

Palate: Sweet & light cocoa butter, bubble gum, cotton candy and a wonderful thread of very august and unusual blueberry fruit on the entry. A bright spirity expansion on mid-palate with tangerine notes and then a drying used up chewing gum feeling on the turn to the finish.  The finish is fairly short and gentle - not really a problem. Lovely - particularly on the sweet candy opening.

A splash of water opens things to an ethereally light sweets and blueberry & gum fruits flavor direction. There is a bit more oak in the end of the mid, but remarkably light and fruity.

Delicious and borderline five stars.

****


Inchgower 29 yo Single Cask Master Of Malt 53.9%

Distilled on the 30th June 1982.  Aged in a single refill hogshead for 29 years before bottling on the 22nd November 2011. A release of just 190 numbered bottles, at natural cask strength

 Color: Pale gold

Nose: Cotton, linseed, apricots, faint acetone, some floral notes, but in the hazy distance - like wildflower meadows sniffed through an excellent linen suit.  Nosing further I'm getting lemon with the apricot, natural painter's oils, and some noble rot rancio notes.  It's very nice nose: distinctive and unique. Subtle, yet very involving.

Palate: Floral sweet, tangy with rubarb and blueberry with a lacy floral delicate expansion into a more spirity mid palate with notes of toasted coconut and sweet dry hay. The fade sees a gentle herbal complexity replace the sweet and heat. Very little wood, little tannin for such a mature dram.  There's a ton of rich complexity in the opening and then a pretty dramatic contrast with a drier elegant mid and short turn to the finish. There's a long lingering afterglow aspect to the finish however, with a glow of sweet blueberries that fills me with an intoxicated infatuation however.  This one elicits a powerfully loving emotional response in me.

*****

Girvan 45 yo 1965 The Clan Denny (Douglas Liang) 47.3%

Distilled 1965 in refill hogshead number 6276
Grain whisky at Girvan is produced using a mix of 90% wheat and 10% malted barley.

Color: Dark gold meets light amber

Nose: Sweet musk, dried marmelade, flax oil, damp meadow, ghee, marigold, dense dark sultanas, noble rot w/blueberry essence, phenolic solvent and a little distant smoke


Palate: rich and spirity but sweet and complex with dried sultanas in grappa. Oily and dense with rancio and blueberry laced mint, cardamom pods and ivy.  There are also hints of citrus.  That's just the opening!  The expansion brings spice and a bitter medicinal herbal aspect to the full palate of flavors carrying over from the openings.  The finish is a slow gentle fade with most of the same flavors holding.  A rich and august presentation. Flavor dense and sophisticated.

*****


Did you catch my error?  Can you see why I might go the whole day - through the tastings and well after and have to be prompted by a friend before realizing that the Inchgower in question was a malt rather than a grain whisky?  It seemed very much of a piece - down to the unusual blueberry noble rot flavor notes.

Tasting the Inchgower after realizing my error I somehow wasn't getting toasted coconut anymore - I was getting toasted malt instead - modifying those distinctive and fairly unusual rubarb and blueberry flavor notes.   What a lovely sweet and complex entry!  This shift from toasted coconut to toasted malt is a pure example of expectation bias in action.  When I thought it was grain I was wanting to taste coconuts.  When I knew it was malt I wanted malt.  What was I ACTUALLY tasting?  Well tasting is a fusion of neural input and sensory input in the brain.  So the answer is that expectation bias affects what you actually taste.  Both sets of tasting notes are valid.  Thus the power and need for tasting blind.  I can see a clear argument for tasting blind every time.  That doesn't mean I'm going to do it.  The extra effort would be crippling for me in my current circumstances - but I will try to do so as often as I can.

What does this tasting say about mature grains?  Two isn't a definitive sampling - but I can state that these were delicious and that they have big openings and then fade from there - which is quite different than many malts which show a more dramatic evolution across the palate from opening to mid palate to finish.

What does this tasting say about Compass Box Hedonism?  Hedonism seems to be a vatting of grains in the 20s (maybe teens through thirties).  I'll need a lot more experience before I could make anything close to an accurate guess.  Hedonism has many of the flavors of the 20 year old North British but with a smoothness and integrated elegance quite unique all its own.

I think this is the beginning of a beautiful relationship - with mature grain Scotch whiskies... and with error checking.